Boston Bomber, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, on the Rolling Stone magazine cover... why would they glorify this man? | #wtf #BostonBomber
@David
Updated July 19, 2013 ● 1,164 views
WTF's
What is Rolling Stone thinking for putting the face of the Boston Bomber, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, on their cover. Are they trying to glorify this man? This is a very good example of irresponsible journalism. The editor who allowed this should be fired!
7 Comments
Sort by BestControversialNew
5
Rolling Stone subscription is probably down. So they need to stir some controversy.
MySQLguru · 11 years ago permalink · reply (0)
2
So is he like a rock and roll icon now? They are so insensitive. Not fair to the victims!
Jodizee · 11 years ago permalink · reply (1)
0
@Jodizee: I agree with you 100%.
Regul8tor · 11 years ago permalink · reply
1
Print magazine is a dying business. They need to stir controversy to survive.
HenryD · 11 years ago permalink · reply (0)
1
These people are just insensitive. Why would feature that Boston Bomber's face on the cover. These people don't think at all.
Jaye88 · 11 years ago permalink · reply (0)
0
I guess they want to portray him like a rockstar.
Regul8tor · 11 years ago permalink · reply (0)
0
Very irresponsible journalism. They're so insensitive.
Rolling Stone subscription is probably down. So they need to stir some controversy.
MySQLguru · 11 years agopermalink · reply (0)
So is he like a rock and roll icon now? They are so insensitive. Not fair to the victims!
Jodizee · 11 years agopermalink · reply (1)
@Jodizee: I agree with you 100%.
Regul8tor · 11 years agopermalink · reply
Print magazine is a dying business. They need to stir controversy to survive.
HenryD · 11 years agopermalink · reply (0)
These people are just insensitive. Why would feature that Boston Bomber's face on the cover. These people don't think at all.
Jaye88 · 11 years agopermalink · reply (0)
I guess they want to portray him like a rockstar.
Regul8tor · 11 years agopermalink · reply (0)
Very irresponsible journalism. They're so insensitive.
Kris · 11 years agopermalink · reply (0)